Corporations often see
being green as ‘soft and fluffy’; a cost not a benefit....
For four years now I
have been analysing corporate governance with master’s students of Edinburgh University
Business School
and others universities around the world, including from the US and the Netherlands ,
for a US
consultancy. The reports remain the property of the universities but a summary
will be out soon and it makes interesting reading for us at green24.
It is only one
element, and I’d be the first to be cautious about any set of data, but one
side line of the survey – which looks at everything from compliance with
governance codes to senior pay and board behaviour – is worth noting here if it
is only in the small print elsewhere.
That is that by
measuring data from the public reports and accounts from the FTSE 100 and
Eurostoxx 50 Indices we have found a reasonable correlation or statistical
relationship between the sustainability parts of the index – environmental
responsibility, emissions data, community investment and such – and long term
financial performance.
In brief, it appears
that being green pays!
It should be noted
that the financial return is seen in long-term return on assets, and not
immediate profitability, but that is what you might intuitively expect and that
is what shareholders often really want to see. We need to do more research in
2013 and extend our reach into Asia, as we are now doing, but it is a glimmer
of an important argument that will help put to bed the old ‘business case’
requirement that is often used as a defence.
Correlation is not
causation but it gives us a start!
David Jackman
No comments:
Post a Comment