There was an interesting phrase buried on page 70 of the UK
House Of Commons Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport issue this week
about phone hacking and News International. The controversial line which did
not get cross party support for the statement that Rupert Murdoch was not a fit
person to be a steward for an international company. The interesting word in
this damning indictment is the word ‘steward’.
The committee might easily have said ‘director’, but they
chose to use steward. The choice is very revealing as it shows a change in
attitude towards the roles, responsibilities and purpose of the main board of directors
and senior management teams in general. The term points up a broadening of the
traditional financial driver of shareholder value, to include a wider set of
responsibilities which relate to other stakeholders, and, I would argue, the
environment. There are many other elements that could be included, but this is
relevant to green24.
We are all stewards of the natural resources around us, as
well as the cultural, economic and capital we create, affect or hold in trust. Unlike
the others, environmental resources have limits; once the damage is done, it is
very difficult to repair or restore. So in this area, which is particularly
fragile, we have to be careful – just as the Murdoch’s have found that good
reputation is extremely fragile and requires careful husbandry.
So maybe this moment marks a shift towards a clearer
statement of directors’ responsibilities.
It is landmark cases like this that change the architecture of corporate
governance. It may not set legal precedents, but it does set a precedent in the
court of public opinion.
Many will be familiar with the concept of triple bottom
line, but this is rather nebulous for companies to grasp in practice. If we can
establish that senior management are more like stewards of our society and
cultural capital than robber barons, then we will have moved on in a way that
most will understand. Companies have responsibilities outside their bubble;
they cannot operate in isolation regardless. Certain things are acceptable and
others are most definite not.
To be a corporate statesman needs higher levels of
competence and integrity; and this integrity needs to extend to the environment
in in which we all live as much as anything else.
D Jackman
No comments:
Post a Comment