Even back home in rural Cumbria, local
collections of recyclable are regular and convenient. Indeed, data on UK
recycling from 2002–2011 shows a dramatic increase in the proportion of
household waste recycled instead of sent to landfills, up
from around 15% to 40%. This is impressive in isolation, though it should
be remembered that the UK was formerly one of the countries in the EU that
recycled least. The success is perhaps based on a clear
central policy which has no direct cost to consumers. In essence, promoting
consumer recycling through local legislation appears to be a genuinely win-win proposal,
where consumer costs are minimal and the costs of transport and processing
waste can be offset by its resale to scrap dealers, paper companies and the
like. It is possible that the recession is responsible and has reduced the amount
of consumer waste produced,
though recycling itself has been shown
to lower consumption with all data being geographically varied.
As recycling has become more routine, basic
assumptions about waste have been subtly challenged—“reduce, reuse, recycle” is
normal. As with all sustainable approaches, sustainable waste disposal involves
taking responsibility for our behaviour, and in the case of waste and
recycling, reconnecting with and re-evaluating our “stuff”. While recycling
could add to a dangerous
idea that limitless consumption can be responsibly managed,
relying on consumers to sort waste for recycling, to select items for charity
shops, and to hand on items to others (via online fora such as www.freecycle.org) allows them to engage with material
things even as they become waste. As you clear out an old home, the irony that
you learn about things as you lose them becomes sadly relevant.
David
and Alex Jackman